Greetings from the Pacific Northeast. (Atlantic Northwest?) Rainy Town.
Talk runs to building arks and impersonating mushrooms here in New England these days, ah-yup. This is not summer as we know it. This wet wet weather we've been having for weeks is supposedly due to a sagging jet stream—as if many of us didn't already have enough sagging going on. Today, another day of rain, was particularly bleak because a friend reported that the meteorologists say this is what we can expect from global warming.
I had decided my current home state of Massachusetts would become the new New Jersey as a result of global warming. A few degrees warmer up here, and now we're the absolute IT state because we're still picturesque, academic, and decidedly open-minded, only now with warmer weather, we have beaches where people can actually swim in the summer without losing appendages to frostbite, and the best skiing on this side of the continent, all within an easy drive. But if we're actually going to become Oregon? Hey, we love you guys out there, but not your weather; this was a low blow.
If Boston is the new Eugene, we've got some changes to make.
New wardrobe pieces: Hoodies. This is a required clothing item. Helps protect your hair-do or hide it if there's no hope in all this humidity. And rubber boots. Practical and, in bright colors and patterns, fun. We need these because our normal fun, like bike riding, tennis, baseball, pool swimming, sailing, and deck sitting, has been washed out. Attired in some polka-dotted wellies, we can enliven our soggy hikes with our dogs, and have dry feet while we weed our gardens to our heart's content because this weather makes the weeds grow like, well, weeds!
New lifestyle statement: TURN OFF THE AC! We can do it easily enough at home, but you proprietors, particularly malls, restaurants, and grocery stores need to follow suit. We're already wet, and we don't want to add wicked cold and clammy to the mix. We'll buy or eat less and leave quicker if you persist in icing us out. (In the meantime, good thing we've got those warm rubber boots, and can put up our hoods to keep warm...)
New activity: Is it the forced captivity from all that rainy weather that makes the Northwest a hot spot for alternative music? Why not here? Break out the instruments, limber up the vocal chords, pull together some waterlogged friends, and start making the music that floats your boat...or ark. Let The Sun Shine In.
Because ya won't be seein' it outside any too soon.
Excerpt from my novella: A Friend of the Race
Johanna
People ask me how my son, Ethan, developed such a fascination with black people from such an early age.
It must have been Michael Jackson on the video. Not Thriller. I wouldn’t have let him watch that as a child – the crotch pulling, the scenes in the graveyard. No, it was a segment in a Chipmunks video, of all things, a compilation of rock ‘n roll takeoffs –real-life footage of stars like Elvis Presley and Elton John, mixed in with those high-pitched cartoon chipmunks. Someone gave it to Ethan for his third birthday. I can still see him watching the video from his usual spot on the sofa in the den, barely batting an eyelid despite the catchy soundtrack. But when Michael Jackson appeared, Ethan was on his feet the entire time, moving to the beat, trying his best to moonwalk in his socks on the hardwood floors. Not in a playful way, either; it was all very serious.
Sometime later, his father, Tad, unbeknownst to me — we were separated at that point —bought the Thriller video, with “Smooth Criminal” and “Billy Jean”. I heard Ethan singing the lyrics, and saw him attempting those crazy dance moves before I found out that he had been watching the video over and over at Tad’s apartment. I asked Tad for the video, so that I could see it for myself, and what I saw disturbed me, never mind a five or six-year old. Tad promised to put the video away, “until Ethan was older”, never admitting it might have been a bad choice.
That must have been the start. But I never could have imagined what would come of it: my seventeen-year-old son at the Roxbury police station over some kind of gangland drug business gone wrong. To this day, I can’t explain why Ethan is the way he is, this strange, unwavering devotion to race. But looking back, I can see the passion was there from the start.

I’ve finally figured out the appeal to boys and young men of wearing their pants slung so low on their body that only a tight belt will keep them up. It’s their secret desire to achieve clothing equality. Women have been cross-dressing for over a century now, so long that we forget it used to be cross-dressing for women to wear pants. Now women can wear whatever they want and no one cares. Women have equal clothing rights. But men? They are still suffering under antiquated and sexist clothing rules that dictate they are not allowed to wear skirts or dresses. On the surface, most men disdain women’s clothes. But subconsciously? They see that they are oppressed and they do the only thing they can: they lower their belt to exactly the same spot where a woman’s mini-skirt would end. Now they’re as restricted as women are! No long strides for them, mincing steps only, and a constant readjustment to keep things just so. So the next time you see a male with his pants slung perilously low, remember, he’s only doing it because secretly he wants to be in a miniskirt.
At Rosie’s Place, the homeless women line up before four o’clock, when they will be admitted to the cafeteria, starting off with soup and sandwiches. The line this day is quiet, little talking, more older women than young, some with children, many women of color. Some are heavy-set in shapeless clothes, and make little eye contact. One woman is neatly dressed in a blouse and skirt, well-spoken in a soft voice. There’s a woman with a panel of gray dreadlocks down her back; she’s a smiley character. And another, the feisty Irish gal, who comes on initially both defensive and antagonistic, but she soon quiets down. Many are regulars and know the routine.
Years ago, I used to say to the boys, “It’s my favorite time of day – pajama time!” And of course, they thought it was corny and strange. Who wanted to go to bed? And what’s the big deal about pajamas? As a new mother, I craved sleep, and couldn’t wait to kick off my shoes, unbutton the pants and unclip the bra. Ah, relaxation. There’s nothing like a comfortable robe and a worn pair of slippers. I’m a girl who loves her sleep, even today. By which I mean, a well placed nap, and sleeping in until eight or nine. Of course, I adjusted to work schedules and then, baby schedules, but not easily or all that willingly. I had assumed aging would take care of things My mother’s side of the family are all early-risers, but I did not get that gene. Each and every day, I groan when the alarm goes off at 6:00 or 6:30. Unlike many people, I’m not programmed to wake up at the same time every day. It’s a struggle, and most likely will remain so. Sigh, sigh, kvetch, kvetch…
So, it’s ironic that early morning has become my favorite time of day. Quite unexpectedly, and without any kind of plan. After the boys are out of the house by 7:15, my husband, Donald, and I have about 30 to 45 minutes of time to sit, drink coffee, look at the paper, and talk. It’s so nice, I can’t tell you. A brief honeymoon of not hurrying; all his attention to myself, without having to compete with every other demand on his time, and he has many, many, many.
We’ve otherwise done a bad job of “couple time” in our relationship, despite the warnings/ encouragements of our mothers. There’s so little free time outside of work. For one, sports. This year, the Bantam team schedule (my son played, my husband coached) was pretty much every Friday night and Saturday night Sept. through April. In essence, our “date” was him on the bench, me in the bleachers, with a hundred other players and parents – we were together, no? In addition, like so many friends, our vacations and outings have been almost exclusively family events, i.e., with kids. Not sure how that evolved.
My mother restricted television in our house, especially during the day, believing there were better ways for children to spend their time. I think she was right. When I became a mother, I continued the tradition of restricting screen time which now meant television, videos and computer games. Virtual reality offered so little to my son's expanding mind, heart and limbs compared to multi-dimensional reality that was out there for the living every single day. This is an opinion I still hold, for children as well as adults. Aren't we adults still expanding our minds and hearts? I wonder often if people watching reality shows ever ask themselves, why am I watching someone else's reality instead of creating my own?
Next internet and email arrived, but in our home this, too, was off limits to our now elementary-school-aged son. I also refused to hop on the wagon myself, observing how quickly one of my friends became addicted, living life through the screen on her computer for hours at a time, oblivious to what her children were doing, and hearing via my son the truly disturbing material this friend's son was coming upon through his unrestricted time surfing the net and chatting with "friends." (We now call them cyber bullies.) The internet was a dark force, needing only the tiniest welcome, a couple punches of a button, to explode and take over the innermost spaces of our home, our sanctuary.
What I had missed was the connection this world wide web offered, a facet of the computer age that magnificently supports what I have come to believe life is all about. Community. Love. Harmony. What an incredibly marvelous gateway this technology gives us into understanding more about everyone and everything everywhere in the whole wide world. Our household has long since joined the technological age and I'm happy my son can easily keep in touch with his friends in towns all over eastern Massachusetts, his cousins in different states, his former classmates and teammates on the other side of the country, and the other side of the world for that matter. The world is truly shrinking, the boundaries fading, our connections strengthening. This is a good thing. And I get it now. I understand why, even though there was no clear redeeming value, there were certain guilty pleasures I've never been able to resist. Like People magazine, that I inhaled whenever it crossed my path—at my mother-in-law's, at the doctor's office, at the hair salon. Like television shows on fashion trends—runway shows, makeovers, clothing design competitions, year in and year out, I'm always watching. And now, like the internet—with a couple clicks I can check out what's new with the Twilight crew and saga, who Oprah's talking to, or where Barack or Michelle Obama are today. Connection. Wonderful, critical, life-supporting connection.
And yet, the virtual reality vs. reality dilemma that reared its head for me so many years ago is not resolved. Picture this: a twenty-something couple walks through Boston Gardens, not gazing into each other's eyes, or holding hands taking in spring together through the glow of first love, but holding cell phones, each of them, head down, talking to someone else. A mother scoots around town in the van, not hearing about the kids' day or playing alphabet, but talking on her cell phone while the kids watch a video in back. A family gathers at the dinner table, not for quiet, enriching, uninterrupted sharing, but disjointed phrases interrupted by tones indicating text messages on the teenager's phone, music ring tones announcing Dad or Mom has a call, and beeps from the hand-held video games the youngest child plays out-of-sight under the table.
All the technological connection in the world will not replace, or supersede, being truly present, and connected, in person. In reality. To each other. I do not believe there is a greater gift that one person can give to another person, anywhere, then the gift of true attention. To look one another in the eye, listen with both ears, attune with all faculties, shutting out all other realities, virtual and otherwise, attending completely to the reality of right now, with this person, this is the ultimate, live connection. Without it, the rest can only grow very, very stale.
At this time of year, I come down with a mildly aggravating disorder that I have come to call Big Family Syndrome, i.e., too many people in the family. My family of origin has become somewhat of a dinosaur in the 21st century: I am one of six children, born to parents of eleven children each, with 70 first cousins between the two sides. In other words, a lot. I thought I was marrying into a smaller, more compact, modern family: my husband is one of three siblings, one of seven cousins. Yet, now I realize, I was deceived. Because in his family, they count second cousins and third cousins, many of whom live close by and keep in touch. Truly, an extended family. Like our family, a clan, if you will.

Our mailbox was "punked" last night. Bashing mailboxes is a long-standing activity in our town. I've heard baseball bats out of car windows as the method of choice. But the forensic examination I conducted this morning doesn't point to hit-and-run violence. The wrought-iron bracket bolted into the granite post was mildly bent, perhaps a construction too sturdy for anyone less than Barry Bonds to destroy quickly with a mere baseball bat. And the mailbox itself did not look batted either, just enough off kilter that the box won't close now. This could have happened falling to the ground. No, the marauders at work last night appeared to have used, not a bat, but a wrench and screwdriver. These vandals removed, and stole, the two bolts that held the mailbox on the bracket. The smaller bolts that remain along the side, holding the mailbox on the wood mounting board, are rusty. I can not imagine anyone could have removed the two main bolts without a tool or two.
MIT students are famous here in Boston for pulling off amazingly smart pranks, like putting a campus police cruiser on the roof of the Great Dome under cover of night. Everyone goes to sleep; no car. Next morning; everyone wakes up to car on top of dome. Supposedly, no one heard a thing.
But this prank in our yard last night was not so smart—vandalizing private property, and since there was mail in the mailbox, my husband suggested the perpetrators be up for a federal offense. And, I heard them. For once, our dog was containing herself, emitting only occasional low growls from the living room beneath me as I lay in bed thinking that the voices and car engine noises outside were next door where a twenty-something daughter comes home late at night. After several minutes, I considered turning on the front lights, which would have set our dog barking full out, to hint that the youngsters might finish up hanging out outside, but I told myself that would be rude. My mistake. What the young people were up to was beyond rude. It was stupid, and wrong.
Last night was senior prom. Is this related? Perhaps. If it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a town to solve these problems. Or maybe a country. I can only think that the parents of the young people out there didn't spend enough time making sure their children realized there were certain lines one doesn't cross over. These kids crossed one last night. But I have also thought for years that we Americans do a poor job of providing our teenagers with positive and attractive venues for recreation. We glamorize alcohol, cars, and sex, while we fail to provide teen centers, glamorize healthy recreational activities, or provide late night meetings spots other than fast food restaurants to further confound a youth population already mired in eating disorders like anorexia and obesity. The single crime belonged to them last night, a small group of kids looking for excitement, but the bigger crime, that this was the best activity they could come up with, belongs to all of us.